answer this question

Harry Potter Question

Why does it say in the first book that Lilly and James Potter were head boy and girl at Hogwarts and in the fifth book it says James was never a prefect

*
You don't have to be a prefect to be Head Boy
Book-Freak posted over a year ago
*
true
TIME-TURNER posted over a year ago
 Joe_1996 posted over a year ago
next question »

Harry Potter  best answer

dixiecup said:
A Head Boy or Head Girl is a seventh-year student who has authority over prefects at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Every year, new prefects get nominated by their Head of House, as does to Head Boy and Headgirl. On the Hogwarts Express, the Head Boy or Headgirl of their house has to go through all the things that is needed to know to be a prefect. Most Head Boys and Head Girls were once prefects, although that is not a necessity; examples being James and Lily Potter. (Harry Potter Wikipedia)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
James becomes a prefect because(since he was a quiditch captain} he has the same authority as a prefect and is eligible 2 b a prefect.
softball27 posted over a year ago
*
yes :)
happyallie posted over a year ago
*
same! ;)
Moonwatcher_123 posted over a year ago
next question »

Answers

midnight-dawn said:
In 5th year Remus was Prefect. According to Sirius the purpose was to keep James and Sirius in line. Events like the Werewolf Prank demonstrated, however, that Remus was ineffectual in that intended goal. OTOH James was improving. Starting from the saving of Snape (and Remus, and Sirius), and then somewhere in 6th year he abandoned pranks because of what Lily said when he tormented Snape. By the end of 6th year he must have become responsible enough. Also, if Dumbledore wanted Lily as Head Girl he may have decided James was the student in her year that was most likely to work well with her.
select as best answer
In 5th year Remus was Prefect. According to Sirius the purpose was to keep James and Sirius in line. Events like the Werewolf Prank demonstrated, however, that Remus was ineffectual in that intended goal. OTOH James was improving. Starting from the saving of Snape (and Remus, and Sirius), and then somewhere in 6th year he abandoned pranks because of what Lily said when he tormented Snape. By the end of 6th year he must have become responsible enough. Also, if Dumbledore wanted Lily as Head Girl he may have decided James was the student in her year that was most likely to work well with her.
posted over a year ago 
*
yes yes i agree
lilysev1134e posted over a year ago
*
that pic creeps me out a little...
TIME-TURNER posted over a year ago
*
lol why?
always_draco posted over a year ago
JenniferDempsey said:
Being a Prefect and being a head girl/boy are different. Being a Prefect dosent mean you will neccessarily be a Head Girl and Vice versa. Im sorry I cant really explain it better.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
makes sense, a short but good answer.
laureng114 posted over a year ago
shyshadow said:
that's because you can be Head boy or Girl even if you weren't a prefect. Simple, right?
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
water-fighter said:
???
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
love_a_lot916 said:
they say this because James wasent a perfect until 7th year they were talking about his fifth year then
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
EdwardCohen said:
because students are Head boy and girl in 7th year and prefects in there 5th year but you don't need to be a prefect to be head boy or girl because in your 5 year you could be a bad student but 3 years lter you could be better and more metur
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
dylin1 said:
Because ya don't exactly have to be a prefect to be a Head Boy/Girl.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Volturrimort said:
Being a prefect is not a prerequisite to becoming Head Boy.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
harrypotter-rox said:
because a they r both differant things, by the time they were old enough to be heads, james was good and lily, well, she was always good.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
bessmarvin1 said:
You don't really have to be a perfect to be Head Girl or Boy
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
jblove123456789 said:
Maybe James was great then but dropped his grades over the years that can happen you know.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
hp_maniac said:
that's a good question,really! I think the information we got in the first book might be wrong because Hagrid might've mistakenly said that.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
RD_Blue_demigod said:
Because james was exceptional,,he headed straight on becoming a head boy because he has a pure talent for it unlike on other wizard7/witch,who needs to be a prefect first before becoming a head boy
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
HarryPotterBabe said:
You can become Head boy without previously being a Prefect.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Snowyowl1028 said:
j.k.rowling probably forgot she wrote that
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
abhishek_27cool said:
nana

select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
??? Okay
Alchemistlover posted over a year ago
Kitcatcmp said:
James was kind of an idiot in his fifth year, so he wasn't prefect, but I guess he shaped up and earned Head Boy later.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
haha! i guess that is true...
Moonwatcher_123 posted over a year ago
next question »